7 La. Ann. 589 | La. | 1852
By the court:
We consider the judgment against Baldree as fully sustained by the evidence. He is estopped from setting up any title adverse to the defendants, by the decree of the chancery court in Alabama, and by the deed executed by him on the 18th of September, 1846, soon after he brought the slave to this State, in contempt of that decree. The decree of compromise is
There was also judgment against the intervenor, Coleman, and he moved for an appeal. But he never gave any appeal bond, and cannot be heard as an appellant without the consent of the defendants. Davis v. Anty, 3 N. S. 142.
It is therefore decreed, that the judgment against Baldree be affirmed, and that he pay the costs of the appeal. It is further decreed that, as to the said Coleman, the appeal be is missed.