History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baker's Appeal
2 Sadler 162
Pa.
1886
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

It was the duty of the garnishee to make full, direct, and true answers to the interrogatories put him. The attempt of the appellant is to now prove a state of facts clearly in conflict with the answers he had made under oath, to the interrogatories. The second, fifth, and seventh were amply sufficient to require him to disclose the purchase which he now sets up. Having failed to do so and averred the contrary, he is estopped by those answers.

Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Case Details

Case Name: Baker's Appeal
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 5, 1886
Citation: 2 Sadler 162
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.