120 S.W.2d 666 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1938
Granting writ of mandamus.
This proceeding is an outgrowth of the decision of this court in Baker v. Baker,
Upon a refusal of the chancellor to enter the judgment as tendered, Mrs. Baker filed in this court what she denominates a "motion for rule." The respondent, Judge Ward, has entered his appearance to the motion but has filed no response other than his notation to the effect that he has refused to enter the judgment for the reasons set out above. Properly, Mrs. Baker should have petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus rather than to follow the summary procedure which she has sought to adopt. Under the circumstances, and in the absence of objections, we shall treat the motion as an application for such a writ. *26
When Mrs. Baker appealed from the judgment of October 19, 1935, it was because of an error of the court in failing to allow her any alimony. It was that error which she sought to have corrected and which was corrected on the appeal. Obviously, therefore, a full correction of that error requires that she be allowed alimony from the date when the erroneous judgment was entered and not simply from the date when the mandate of this court was filed.
It follows, therefore, that she is entitled to a judgment for alimony commencing with the date that the erroneous decree was entered and otherwise in conformity with the mandate of this court heretofore issued.
The writ of mandamus is granted.