Baker v. State, 211 So. 2d 59

Baker v. State

211 So. 2d 59

Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

1968

Check Treatment

PER CURIAM.

The only point preserved for review on this appeal is the question of the “voluntariness” of a statement given by the appellant.

From the record, it appears that counsel for the appellant [defendant in the trial court] conceded that the statement was given voluntarily. Therefore, we find the point not to be well taken on this appeal. Compare: Morgan v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 60; State v. Jones, Fla.1967, 204 So.2d 515; Colebrook v. State, Fla.App.1968, 205 So.2d 675; Grace v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 225; Harris v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 108; DeRiggi v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 714 [opinion filed April 30, 1968],

Affirmed.