History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baker v. State
188 So. 2d 346
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1966
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

While serving sentence imposed for certain felonies as to which the appellant had pleaded guilty, he moved to vacate the judgment and sentences, under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix-After an evidentiary hearing thereon the motion was denied, and the defendant appealed. We affirm the trial judge’s order denying the motion under Criminal Procedure Rule 1. A defendant’s reliance on his retained attorney’s expression of belief that a plea of guilty will result in leniency is not ground for collateral attack, under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, of an adjudication of guilt entered on such plea. Williams v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 775; Manning v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 380.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Baker v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 28, 1966
Citation: 188 So. 2d 346
Docket Number: No. 65-932
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.