History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baker v. State
97 Ga. 351
Ga.
1895
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

A ground of a motion for a new trial alleging that “the court erred in overruling the motion to exclude from the jury all that occurred on the trial of the case of State vs. Thomas H. Baker in Bartow Superior Court,” not only fails to clearly and distinctly set forth the commission of any error, but presents no question of law which this court can intelligently pass upon and decide.

2. An examination of the r.ecord discloses no error on the part of the trial judge, and affirmatively shows that the verdict was demanded by the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Indictment for carrying concealed weapon. Before Judge Akin. City court of Cartersville. September term, 1895. Glenn & Rountree, for plaintiff in error. A. W. Fite, solicitor-general, and A. S. Jolrnson, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Baker v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 21, 1895
Citation: 97 Ga. 351
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.