Baker v. State, 904 So. 2d 505

Edward E. Baker, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of the defendant‘s ‍​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‍motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) finding that his claim of vindictive sentencing cannot ‍​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‍be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Benedetto v. State, 895 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), citing Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

KLEIN, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Baker v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: May 18, 2005

Citations: 904 So. 2d 505; 2005 WL 1163400; 4D05-1445

Docket Number: 4D05-1445

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.