Baker v. City of East Orange

96 N.J.L. 267 | N.J. | 1921

Per, Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief ’ Justice, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kaltsci-i, Ivatzenbaoh, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.