2 Doug. 169 | Mich. | 1845
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The object of the bill in this case, was to foreclose a mortgage executed by Murphy and wife, to the President, Directors and Company of the Bank of River Raisin, and which, by assignment, became the property of the complainants. The bill contains the following, among other averments: “ And your orators further show, that they
A more important question has seldom been presented for our decision; but we are constrained to withhold the expression of any opinion upon the merits of that question, for the obvious reason that it is not, and cannot properly
Decree affirmed.