250 Mo. 514 | Mo. | 1913
OPINION.
(after stating the facts as above).
It would be obviously unfair to use the first draft of that document against the plaintiff without permitting it to show the second notice made for the purpose of rectifying the former and showing the real nature of its claim against defendant. This matter of filing the claim for a lien was all one transaction and did not become otherwise by the lapse of the few days necessary for the attorney to ascertain the facts before amending his claim in accordance therewith. As the defendant had used a part of this transaction, the plaintiff was entitled that the whole of it should be disclosed to the jury.
IY. This cause has been tried in conformity with the laws declared on' its last appeal. The result is the judgment must be affirmed.