History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baggs v. State
43 Ga. App. 427
Ga. Ct. App.
1931
Check Treatment
Bboyxes, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and under the particular facts of the case the special grounds of the motion for a new trial (complaining of three excerpts from the charge of the court) show no error requiring a reversal of the judgment. The cases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error are distinguishable by their facts from this ease, and, therefore, the rulings made therein are not applicable ■ here.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., eoneurs. Bloodioorth, J., absent on account of illness.

Case Details

Case Name: Baggs v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 9, 1931
Citation: 43 Ga. App. 427
Docket Number: 21465
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.