History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bagdad Land & Lumber Co. v. Boyette
104 Fla. 696
Fla.
1931
Check Treatment

*1 State, laws which the Courts United judicial States take notice. The averment that bonds held the laws sion of law pursuant were executed State, is but a statement of a conclu which is not admitted demurrer. The fatally declaration is defective stating for not necessary facts judge enable the court to for itself whether that conclusion any of law has foundation in Pumpelly fact. Bay Co., v. Green 13 Wall. 166, 175, (80 Cragin U. S. Bk. 20 L. 557); ed. Lovell, v. 109 U. S. (Bk. 903); 27 L. ed. Co., Kennard v. Cass Dill. 147; Broome Taylor, 76 N. Y. Cotton v. New Providence, 18 Vroom 401.” For the stated, reasons affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed. and Brown, J.J.,

Ellis Whitfield, P.J., J., opinion concur in the Davis, judgment.

Bagdad Land Plain Company, and Lumber corporation, Error, vs. Jesse O. Boyette, in his own behalf Vicey wife, oh behalf of Boyette, his

138 So. 382.

En Banc. Opinion filed December 1931. January 5, Writ of error reinstated 1932. *2 Maxwell, Plain- for and E. G. & Pasco & Brown Watson Error; in in for McGeachy, A. B. transcript appears the Commissioner.'—-It Mathews, a upon had a trial was

of the filed herein that record for de- that a verdict sounding in tort and declaration in fendant error was rendered.

No of any appears sort in the transcript and the Clerk’s certificate is that the contains * * * * * * transcript “a correct of the record in the case and a copy papers true correct recital and of all such proceedings appears upon in said the cause as the my records and of officethat have been directed to files transcript by in be included said the written demands of parties.” the said making up for

The directions to the Clerk the tran- require script rule, the the record, of the do not transcript; the in but as included the requires that it rule the certificate the Clerk to state transcript judg- “a correct of the record of the contains required case”, together matters ment in the with other duty it is the “by parties”, the written demands of in the record transcript the Clerk to include or order judgment, copy of the decree cases a correct all taken, is of error appealed or to which writ from should error, appellant, though for in or counsel ab- up, properly made since that the record see or order judgment, decree of the sence or of error jurisdiction is without court appeal must be dismissed. of error statute, writs

Under Sections new trials. orders or from judgments (2905) Compiled General Laws of Florida 1927. upon final judgment

Where no the merits of the cause appears an action at law brought Supreme Court on a to the writ be dismissed judgment, such a at cost the plaintiff in error. Jones v. Tyler, 58 283; Flournoy Fla. v. Interstate Electric Co., 214, 55 Sylvester, 232, 83 So. 876. *3 provisions

Under the Section 4606 (2905) Compiled General 1927, Laws Florida writs of error final judgments and from orders trial, new and when a car- by ried error to the court for review cause, fails to show a final such writ by proprio the court dismissed ex motu. 299, 414; & R. Berry, N. Co. v. Louisville Lewis, vs. McKinnon v. Sylvester, supra. being transcript,

There no final writ of error is dismissed.

Per Curiamd —The record in having this cause been con by court, sidered foregoing opinion prepared Chapter 14553, (Extra Acts of 1929 Sess.), adopted opinion, the court as its there being no judg ment it considered, ordered and de creed the court that be, and the is, hereby same dismissed.

- Buford, C.J., Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J.,

Case Details

Case Name: Bagdad Land & Lumber Co. v. Boyette
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Dec 10, 1931
Citation: 104 Fla. 696
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.