2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 365 | Conn. App. Ct. | 1963
The defendants Davies, owners of a lot in Greenwich, entered into a contract with the defendant Parkway Homes, Inc., for the construction of a Plymouth home thereon. Parkway Homes, Inc., thereupon contracted with the defendant Charles Davis for the erection of this house. Davis
From the judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendants Davies have appealed, claiming that the plaintiff, after substantially completing the job, had no right to return to complete a trifling amount of work and that its right to a lien had not been extended thereby.
To determine whether the trial court erred in its conclusion that the lien in this case was valid, it is necessary to apply to the facts the principles set forth in the Martin Tire case, supra, viz., where the
The fact that the defendants Davies did not direct the plaintiff to return to complete the work is of no consequence. Nor is there any merit to their claim that the plaintiff surreptitiously returned in order to revive an expired lien, there being no evidence or finding to that effect.
The evidence supports the court’s findings of fact and those findings sustain its final conclusion that the lien was valid.
There is no error.
In this opinion Deabiwgtoít and Jacobs, Js., concurred.