History
  • No items yet
midpage
Babcock v. Briggs
52 Cal. 502
Cal.
1877
Check Treatment

Injured party may waive tort, and sue in assumpsit. (Fratt v. Clark, 12 Cal. 90; Roberts v. Fvans, 43 Cal. 382; Tuite v. Wakelee, 19 Cal. 692; Caussidiere v. Beers, 2 Keyes, 198; Civil Code, sec. 1621.)

Cope & Boyd, for Respondents.

The action is not upon a contract within the meaning of the statute. (Code of Civil Procedure, secs. 537, 538.) The gravamen of the action is a tort—a wrongful conversion of the property and money of the plaintiffs. There is no allegation of any promise or undertaking on the part of the defendants, and the idea of a contract is expressly negatived by the averments of the complaint.

By the Court :

The facts stated in the complaint do not make a case which would support a writ of attachment under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Order affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Case Details

Case Name: Babcock v. Briggs
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1877
Citation: 52 Cal. 502
Docket Number: No. 5559
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.