B.G. v. A.M.O.B.G. v. A.M.O.
The court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s application for a forensic evaluation (see Matter of James Joseph M. v Rosana R., 32 AD3d 725, 727 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 717 [2006];
We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Buckley and Sweeny, JJ.