B. A. D. v. State, 379 So. 2d 1311

PER CURIAM.

The restitution order attending this probation for the two minor appellants is not erroneous for requiring each to repay $172.00, one-third of the aggregate thefts by appellants and another using the same credit card. Assuming that, an evidentiary hearing is not required on the amount of each child’s separate charges on the card. The words “or such other amount deemed due by the probation counselor” are stricken from the order, which is otherwise

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., LARRY G. SMITH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: B. A. D. v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Feb 13, 1980

Citations: 379 So. 2d 1311; 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15954; Nos. PP-214, PP-215

Docket Number: Nos. PP-214, PP-215

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.