Ayers v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

105 Ga. 836 | Ga. | 1898

Fish, J.

The evidence introduced upon the trial of this ease demanded' a verdict for the defendant. Consequently, the court committed no. ' error in directing a verdict in its favor.

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring, except Isumpkin, P. J., absent.

Action for damages. Before F. O. Foster, judge pro bac ■vice. Baldwin superior court. July term, 1898.

Roberts & Pottle, for plaintiff. Lawton & Cunningham and John T. Allen, for defendant.