History
  • No items yet
midpage
Axelrod v. State
789 S.W.2d 594
Tex. Crim. App.
1990
Check Treatment

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by one prior conviction, at thirty (30) days in the Harris County Jail. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed on appeal. Axelrod v. State, 764 S.W.2d 296 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1988).

We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to examine the following ground for review: “The Court of Appeals erred in holding that the evidence was sufficient because there was no evidence of a voluntary act of omission by appellant as required by section 6.01 of the Penal Code.”

After careful review of the briefs and the Court of Appeals’ opinion, we have determined that appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted.

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is therefore ordered dismissed.

BERCHELMANN, J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: Axelrod v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 30, 1990
Citation: 789 S.W.2d 594
Docket Number: No. 127-89
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In