History
  • No items yet
midpage
Averitt v. . Murrell
49 N.C. 322
N.C.
1857
Check Treatment

We cannot imagine how, in any proper sense, the burning of log-heaps in one's own enclosed field, can be called burning his woods. The term "woods," as used in the statute, (see Rev. Stat., ch. 16; Rev. Code, ch. 16, sec. 1) means forest lands in their natural state, and is used in contradistinction to lands cleared and enclosed for cultivation. The statute is a penal one, and must, therefore, be construed strictly; but, whether construed strictly or liberally, we are clearly of opinion that the facts proved do not bring the defendant either within the letter or spirit of it. The judgment must be affirmed.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Averitt v. . Murrell
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 5, 1857
Citation: 49 N.C. 322
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.