MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jоe Charles Avants was convicted by jury of Assault With a Deadly Weapon, After Former Conviction of Two Felonies, in violation of 21 O.S.1979 Supp. § 652, in the District Cоurt of Tulsa County, Case No. CRF-79-2908. He was sentenced to a term of thirty years’ imprisonment.
Police officers Thompson and Fagan were summoned to the appellant’s mother’s home to investigate a reportеd domestic disturbance. After arriving at the home, the officers were dirеcted to a bedroom where they found the appellant lying down. Officer Fagan requested the appellant stand up several times. The appellant replied that the officers had no right to be therе and then reached under his pillow, grabbed a pistol and aimed at Offiсer Fagan. The officer immediately knocked the pistol to the floor and arrested the appellant.
Of the numerous propositiоns of. error submitted by the appellant, we find it necessary co discuss оnly one as it merits reversal of the judgment and sentence.
The appellant was charged with assault with a deadly weapon pursuant to
Evеry person who intentionally and wrongfully shoots another with any kind of firearm, with intent to kill any person, is punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary not exceeding life. Any person who commits any assault and battery upon another by means of any deadly weapon, or by such other means or fоrce as is likely to produce death or in any manner attempts to kill another, or in resisting the execution of any legal process, is рunishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary not exceeding twenty (20) years.
The jury found him guilty of the same offense. The appellant complains thаt there was insufficient evidence at trial to convict him under § 652. We agrеe.
Battery is dеfined in section 642 of Title 21, of the Oklahoma Statutes as “any wilful and unlawful use оf force or violence upon the person of another.” Wе held in Hall v. State,
The evidence at trial gave no indication that a battery occurred. A gun was apparently pointed at one of the poliсe officers, but no allegation of the gun firing or being used to strike the officer was made. The evidence supports a conviction for assault, which is “any wilful and unlawful attempt or offer with force or violencе to do a corporal hurt to another.” 21 O.S.1981, § 641. Without evidence of а battery, however, the appellant was improperly conviсted under § 652, and his judgment and sentence must be Reversed and Remanded for furthеr proceedings in accordance with the foregoing opinion.
Notes
. The information reads in pertinent part:
Joe Charles Avants ... did unlawfully, feloni-ously, wilfully, wrongfully and intentionally, with intent to do bodily harm . .. commit an assault upon one Robert Morgan Fagan, with a deadly weapon.. ..
