No. 92-0888 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Nov 3, 1993
We affirm, except that it is impermissible to impose consecutive mandatory minimum terms on a violent habitual felony offender where the offenses arose from the same criminal episode. Daniels v. State, 595 So. 2d 952" date_filed="1992-02-20" court="Fla." case_name="Daniels v. State">595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Further, the state concedes error. We reverse this aspect and remand for resentencing to correct the error.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.