History
  • No items yet
midpage
Austin v. Meyer
413 U.S. 905
SCOTUS
1973
Check Treatment

*905Appeal from D. C. M. D. Fla. Reported below: 319 F. Supp. 457;

*906No. 71-1318.

Appeal from D. C. Mass. Reported below: 313 F. Supp. 757; and

Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. Judgments vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.

Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgments. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgments and remand the cases for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47.

Case Details

Case Name: Austin v. Meyer
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 25, 1973
Citation: 413 U.S. 905
Docket Number: No. 70-35; No. 71-304; No. 71-1318
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.