midpage

Austin v. . ClarkeAustin v. . Clarke

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 5, 1874
Reporters:
Before:
ByNuM
ByNüM, J.

The C. C. P. invests the Court with ‍​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‍ample powers, in all questions of practice and procedure, both as to amendments and continuances, to ‍​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‍be exercised at the discretion of the J udge presiding, who is presumed’, best, to know what ‍​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‍orders and what indulgence will promote the ends of justice, in each particular case- With the exercise ‍​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‍of this discretion, we cannot interfere, and it is not the subject of appeal. C. C. ‍​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‍P., sec. 133.

There is no error.

Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Austin v. . Clarke
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 5, 1874
Citation: 70 N.C. 458
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In