midpage

August v. StasakAugust v. Stasak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 13, 1978
Appeals Nos. 1098, 1143
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Cercone

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Orders affirmed.






Dissenting Opinion

HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ.,

dissent on the ground that the rule of Brakeman v. Potomac Ins. Co., 472 Pa. 66, 371 A.2d 193 (1977) should be applied, as it was applied in Brakeman, to all cases pending on appeal.

WATKINS, former President Judge, and CERCONE, J., did not participate ‍​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‍in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: August v. Stasak
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 13, 1978
Citations: 384 A.2d 1359; 253 Pa. Super. 310; 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2776; Appeals Nos. 1098, 1143
Docket Number: Appeals Nos. 1098, 1143
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
Log In