History
  • No items yet
midpage
Auditorium Co. v. Commissioner
1926 BTA LEXIS 2944
B.T.A.
1926
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

*164OPINION.

Lansdon :

The petitioner contends that it is entitled to an annual deduction from gross income on account of depreciation and economic obsolescence of its property at the rate of 4 per cent on the original cost. From the evidence adduced we conclude that the profitable use and economic life of the petitioner’s building can not be more than *16525 years from tlie date of its construction. Measured by the value of the land and the depreciated cost of the building during the taxable years, the annual net income returns a constantly decreasing percentage of profit on the capital value of the property, and we are of the opinion that this petitioner is entitled to deduct annually 4 per cent of the cost of the building from its gross income during each of the taxable years and to any adjustments of invested capital that may result from such deduction for depreciation, including obsolescence. Appeal of Robert H. McCormick, 2 B. T. A. 430; Appeal of Annie L. Dean, 3 B. T. A. 896.

Judgment will be entered on 20 days' notice, under Rule 50.

Case Details

Case Name: Auditorium Co. v. Commissioner
Court Name: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Date Published: Oct 21, 1926
Citation: 1926 BTA LEXIS 2944
Docket Number: Docket No. 4483.
Court Abbreviation: B.T.A.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.