History
  • No items yet
midpage
Atwell v. Winkler
196 A.D. 946
N.Y. App. Div.
1921
Check Treatment

The sealed verdict for defendant is against the court’s plain charge. To find defendant free from blame, the jury must have disregarded his own account of the way he ran the car from the Boulevard into Bay Sixty-second street, his rash run toward the shore ending in breakneck plunge through the barriers to the beach beneath. If the jury got the unfounded idea that one having a friendly gratuitous ride was not entitled to proper care, and had no remedy for such carelessness, they failed to heed what the court had plainly laid down for their guidance. The order setting aside this verdict is, therefore, *947unanimously affirmed, with, costs. Present — Mills, Rich, Putnam, Blaekmar and Jaycox, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Atwell v. Winkler
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 15, 1921
Citation: 196 A.D. 946
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.