Jeff Barnes, Secretary Home Inspector Registration Board
2915 S.W. Wanamaker Rd., Suite 100 Topeka, KS 66614
Dear Mr. Barnes:
As Secretary of the Kansas Home Inspector Registration Board (HIRB), you ask whether K.S.A. 2010 Supp.
(a) . . . the board may deny, suspend or revoke a registration, or may impose probationary conditions on a registrant or applicant if the registrant or applicant has engaged in any of the following conduct:
. . .
(4) performing any of the following acts as part of the home inspection:
. . .
(B) offering or delivering any commission, referral fee or kickback for the referral of any business to the home inspector.
In your letter, you state that the drafters of this statute intended to prohibit only "kickbacks" paid by home inspectors to induce other persons to engage in fraud or collusion. You further state that this statute was not intended to prevent the use of traditional incentive marketing techniques, such as paying a fee to a realtor for referring a client to the home inspector.
The most fundamental rule of statutory construction is that the intent of the legislature governs if that intent can be ascertained.1 The legislature is presumed to have expressed its intent through the language of the statute.2 When the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, appellate courts will not speculate as to the legislative intent behind it and will not read the statute so as to add something not readily found in it.3
We note that the language of K.S.A. 2010 Supp.
Sincerely,
Derek Schmidt Attorney General
Sarah Fertig Assistant Attorney General
DS:AA:SF:ke
