History
  • No items yet
midpage
801 A.2d 951
D.C.
2002

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the motion of appel-lee, Gerald I. Shugoll, for clarification of the court’s opinion filed January 10, 2002, and appellants’ opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the court’s opinion filed Januai’y 10, 2002, is amended as follows:

On page 561, footnote 3 of 778 A.2d 559, should read:

The claim against Dr. Shugoll was “dismissed in its entirety” on June 7, 2000, without explanation. No appeal was taken from this order of dismissal. The complaint against GUMC Unified Billing Services, Dr. Colson and Sheil-ene Scott was dismissed on June 7, 2000, for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” On February 15, 2001, the complaint “as to all claims asserted against Defendants” was dismissed “for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”

Case Details

Case Name: Atraqchi v. GUMC Billing Services
Court Name: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 12, 2002
Citations: 801 A.2d 951; 2002 WL 1371073; No. CA1780-00
Docket Number: No. CA1780-00
Court Abbreviation: D.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Atraqchi v. GUMC Billing Services, 801 A.2d 951