99 Iowa 234 | Iowa | 1896
The argument makes a reference to the extent of the lien asked, but not in such a way that we feel called upon to deal with that question. We think the lien should have been established.
Our considerations lead to the following conclusions: On the appeal of the Chicago, Root Island & Pacific Railway Company, intervener, the judgment is reversed. On the appeal of Laflin & Rand Powder Company, intervener, it is affirmed.