889 | 2d Cir. | Mar 30, 1989
870 F.2d 93" court="2d Cir." date_filed="1989-03-30" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/atlantic-avenue-oil--gas-ltd-v-texaco-refining-and-marketing-inc-and-amoco-oil-company-519981?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="519981">870 F.2d 93
ATLANTIC AVENUE OIL & GAS, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING INC. and Amoco Oil Company,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 889, Docket 88-9049.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued March 13, 1989.
Decided March 30, 1989.
Hewitt L. Rubel, New York City (Maggin & Swan, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
Joseph P. Foley, White Plains, N.Y., for defendant-appellee, Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.
Richard R. Lutz, New York City (Michael S. Belohlavek, Mathew S. Rosengart, Townley & Updike, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Amoco Oil Co.
Before MESKILL and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges, and CONBOY,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Nickerson, J., denying the motion of plaintiff-appellant Atlantic Avenue Oil & Gas, Ltd. for a preliminary injunction and dismissing its complaint.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons set out in Judge Nickerson's opinion below, 699 F. Supp. 27" court="E.D.N.Y" date_filed="1988-11-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/atlantic-ave-oil--gas-ltd-v-texaco-refining-and-marketing-inc-1418813?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1418813">699 F.Supp. 27 (E.D.N.Y.1988).
Honorable Kenneth Conboy, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation