History
  • No items yet
midpage
Atkinson v. Orr-Ault Construction Co.
124 Ohio St. 100
Ohio
1931
Check Treatment

This matter was submitted at an earlier date of this term, and a rehearing having been granted, and reargument had, the court has reached the conclusion that Section 2365-3, General Code, requiring one performing labor or furnishing material in the construction, erection, alteration or repair of a building, work or improvement, under contracts referred to in such section, to furnish the sureties on the bond of the principal contractor a statement of the amount due such person, firm or corporation before suit may be brought upon such *Page 103 bond, is jurisdictional in character. In this case, it being conceded that no such statement was furnished, the demurrers to the petition for failure to so show were rightly sustained by the courts below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals in affirming the judgment of the court of common pleas is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and ROBINSON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Atkinson v. Orr-Ault Construction Co.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 18, 1931
Citation: 124 Ohio St. 100
Docket Number: 22443
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.