History
  • No items yet
midpage
Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co.
185 Ga. 379
Ga.
1938
Check Treatment
Grice, Justice.

This ease is controlled, by the ruling in Rose Theatre Inc. v. Lilly, 185 Ga. 53 (193 S. E. 866), wherein it was held that it was not error to overrule a demurrer to the petition brought by the solicitor-general, containing allegations very similar to those made in this petition, and which are substantially set forth in the accompanying statement of facts. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, L. L. Meadors, and Moon & Ray, for plaintiffs. Wyatt & Morgan and Lovejoy & Mayer, for defendants.

Case Details

Case Name: Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 14, 1938
Citation: 185 Ga. 379
Docket Number: No. 12147
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.