History
  • No items yet
midpage
Atkinson v. Graham
5 Watts 411
Pa.
1836
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The evidence in derogation of the plaintiff’s character, which was not put in issue by the pleadings, ought not to have been received. The plaintiff’s declarations also, in regard to the state of the accounts, previous to the date of the note, were inadmissible; but so much of the evidence as went to show a receipt of the defendant’s money since was proper.

Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.

Case Details

Case Name: Atkinson v. Graham
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 15, 1836
Citation: 5 Watts 411
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.