History
  • No items yet
midpage
Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.
59 N.Y.2d 919
NY
1983
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Reid S. Moule (90 AD2d 332). Additionally we observe that there is no evidentiary support in the record for any finding that the scrap metals/raw materials market (as distinguished from the shredded scrap/products market) was limited to the Rochester area to which the agreement of the parties related.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer concur; Judge Simons taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 28, 1983
Citation: 59 N.Y.2d 919
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.