24 Kan. 265 | Kan. | 1880
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This was an action brought under the stock law of 1874, by the defendant in error against the
We have examined-all the record, and find the objection well taken. The evidence is substantially that the cow left home in the morning of a day in September, 1879, in good condition; that she came home in the evening with a bruised hip; that she was accustomed to cross the railroad track every day to go upon' the range, and to return again across the track in the evening; that the owner heard a train about 4 p. M. of the day she was hurt, whistle cattle off the track. No one saw the cow get hurt. No one saw the cow get on the track. No one knew where she got hurt. No one saw her go toward, or come from the track, and no one really knew that she was upon the railroad track the day she was injured. We consider the judgment unsupported -by the evidence, and this is, therefore, of that class of cases in which this court awards a new trial owing to a total failure of proof.
The judgment will be reversed, and a new trial granted.
