This is an appeal by the assessors of Framingham from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board granting a partial abatement, to the amount of $189.20, of a tax of $277.20 assessed on the real estate of the taxpayer in the town of Framingham for the year 1950. The case was submitted to the board on a statement of agreed facts, which facts were adopted by the board as its findings. It appears that the taxpayer, First Parish in Framingham, is a religious organization. On January 1, 1950, it owned a parcel
The rooms so described, other than the minister’s study and the seven rooms in the rear of the building, were at different times during the year 1950 used for the following purposes: “On October 12, 1950, the rooms were used for an auction sale of personal property donated to the Parish for the purpose of being sold to raise money for the Parish. On other dates in that year card parties were held to raise money for the Parish. In April, August and September of 1950 use of the rooms was permitted to individuals for the purpose of holding a wedding reception in each instance. In September and October use of the rooms was permitted to ‘The Villagers,’ a social organization to which some members of the Parish belong.” At times in October, November, and December the Framingham Historical and Natural History Society, the Framingham Garden Club, the American Veterans Committee, the United World Federalists, and the
“The property was valued by the assessors of the town of Framingham at $1,300 for the land and $10,000 for the building, making a total of $11,300. An exemption of $5,000 was granted under c. 59, § 5, cl. 11, of the General Laws on the building as a parsonage, and a tax was assessed to the Parish on $6,300 valuation, at the rate of $44 per thousand, in the amount of $277.20, which tax was paid prior to November 1, 1950.”
The board found “that a portion of the real estate in question (not including the parsonage) is appropriated for religious worship and instruction in conjunction with the adjacent church of the . . . [[taxpayer] . . . that the value of the real estate appropriated to such uses is $4,300 ... [[and that the taxpayer is] entitled to an abatement in the amount of $4,300.” The contentions of the assessors on their appeal are that the board was not warranted in finding that the portions of the real estate referred to in its findings were appropriated for religious worship and instruction in conjunction with the adjacent church of the taxpayer and that the value of the real estate so appropriated was $4,300. Other contentions as to the correctness of certain rulings of
The statute pertaining to the exemption which the taxpayer here claims is G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 59, § 5, as amended by St. 1938, c. 317, which provides that “The following property and polls shall be exempt from taxation: . . . Eleventh, Houses of religious worship owned by, or held in trust for the use of, any religious organization . . . and, to an amount not exceeding five thousand dollars for each parsonage, parsonages so owned or held; but such exemptian shall not, except as herein provided, extend to any portion of any such house of religious worship appropriated for purposes other than religious worship or instruction.”
The “burden of proof is upon the one claiming an exemptian from taxation to show clearly and unequivocally that he comes within the terms of the exemption.”
Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc.
v.
Assessors of Boston,
As the subsidiary findings are undisputed, the questions for decision are whether the conclusions of the board are consistent with these findings and are warranted as matter of law.
The parish building, although physically separate from the church, is maintained as a place for activities which normally accompany and supplement the religious work of a parish and which frequently are housed in the vestry of the parish church. See
South Congregational Meeting House in Lowell
v.
Lowell,
The board has considered the land and building as a whole and has found that, apart from the exemption for the parsonage, a further exemption should be granted amounting to $4,300. The board was not required to specify the particular portion of the premises it had in mind in arriving at this conclusion. It is sufficient that it could have found that a portion of the premises, exclusive of the parsonage, was primarily devoted to religious purposes and was of the value of $4,300. The problem of determining value is like that of appraising damage. It seldom can be proved with the exactness of mathematical demonstration but must be left to estimate and judgment.
Piper
v.
Childs,
Abatement is granted in the sum of $189.20, and the treasurer of the town of Framingham is ordered to pay to
So ordered.
