60 So. 226 | La. | 1912
This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion to dissolve an injunction against further proceeding under a writ of executory process sued out by the defendant M. Hirsch.
The petition refers to another injunction in the same ease, which had been dissolved because plaintiff had not been authorized to sue, and to a judgment rendered against the petitioner on the merits from which she had obtained and perfected an appeal to the Supreme Court. The petition further alleges that the property is advertised for sale, on the next day, and if allowed to sell will operate an irreparable injury to the petitioner. The petition further alleges that the petitioner is entitled to a writ of injunction, and for such purpose annexes by reference her original petition, and adopts each and every allegation therein contained.
The petitioner prays for a writ of injunction enjoining M. Hirsch and the sheriff "from
The defendant M. Hirsch appeared and averred that the plaintiff asked for and obtained an order for a devolutive appeal, and perfected only a devolutive appeal, and that such appeal did not arrest execution of the judgment, and therefore the injunction should be dissolved with the statutory interest and damages, and $50 for attorney fees, and the defendant prayed for judgment accordingly against the plaintiff and her bondsmen.
The motion to dismiss the injunction was taken up, evidence adduced, and the motion was overruled. The defendant Hirsch took a devolutive appeal from the judgment overruling his motion.
On Motion to Dismiss.
On the Merits.
We are satisfied that counsel on both sides and the judge below in the trial of the case considered the record of the main suit, as otherwise no judgment could have been rendered in the case. Through inadvertence, the record was not filed in evidence.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment below be reversed, and this case be remanded for further proceedings according to law; costs of this appeal to be paid by the appellant.