History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ashton Bell 28 Property, LLC v. Infinite Marketing Group of Arizona, LLC
2:07-cv-02092
D. Ariz.
Jan 4, 2008
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 2:07-cv-02092-JAT Document 8 Filed 01/04/08 Page 1 of 1 WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Ashton Bell 28 Property LLC, ) No. CV 07-2092-PHX-JAT

) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) vs. )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Infinite Marketing Group of Arizona LLC; Valdel Xtent US, LLC,

Defendants.

IT IS ORDERED that on February 4, 2008, at 11:30 a.m., Plaintiff shall appear and show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Specifically, Plaintiff alleged jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. ยง1332, which requires complete diversity of citizenship. However, Plaintiff failed to alleged the citizenship of each member of each limited liability company; therefore, Plaintiff failed to allege the citizenship of the parties sufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction. [1]

DATED this 3 rd day of January, 2008.

[1] Unincorporated enterprises are analogized to partnerships, which take the 25 citizenship of every general and limited partner. Carden v. Arkoma Associates , 494 U.S. 185 (1990). ... [L]imited liability companies are citizens 26 of every state of which any member is a citizen. Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C. , 350 F.3d 691, 692 (7 th Cir. 27 2003); see also Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9 th Cir. 28 2006).

Case Details

Case Name: Ashton Bell 28 Property, LLC v. Infinite Marketing Group of Arizona, LLC
Court Name: District Court, D. Arizona
Date Published: Jan 4, 2008
Docket Number: 2:07-cv-02092
Court Abbreviation: D. Ariz.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.