Plaintiffs, who are developers, sought to amend the zoning ordinance and zoning map of the City of Suwanee to change the zoning of 25.307 acres of land from R-100 (single family residential) to RM-8 (multi-family). During the public hearing, the plaintiffs’ representative told the city council:
The existing zoning, I do not believe is really what you would call a constitutional zoning. The [land use] plans say-' ing you are not being industrial. Actually, when you look at physically the use of it, the property is developed at R-100 *155 due to the flood plain involved, you would end up with approximately (inaudible) on Buford Highway, which is not an ideal planning situation.
After the city council unanimously denied the application for rezoning, plaintiffs filed suit and asserted that the property’s R-100 zoning classification was unconstitutional. The city moved for summary judgment. Relying upon
DeKalb County v. Post Properties,
“A constitutional attack on a zoning classification cannot be made for the first time in the superior court.” DeKalb County v. Post Properties, [supra]; McCamy v. DeKalb County,246 Ga. 293 (271 SE2d 214 ) (1980). That is to say, a constitutional attack upon a zoning classification has to be raised before the board of county commissioners (zoning authority). ■This requirement affords the county commissioners an opportunity to amend the zoning ordinance to the classification sought or to an intermediate classification which is constitutional, and puts them on notice of possible litigation if they do not. Moreover, it focuses the commissioners’ consideration on the factors affecting the constitutionality of the existing zoning classification. See Guhl v. Holcomb Bridge Rd. Corp.,238 Ga. 322 , 323-324 (232 SE2d 830 ) (1977). On the other hand, boards of county commissioners hearing zoning applications are not sitting as judges, and the requirement of notice is afforded to them so that they may amend the zoning ordinance if it needs to be amended, not so they can hold the ordinance constitutional or unconstitutional.
DeKalb County v. Bremby, 252
Ga. 510-511 (
The plaintiffs’ attack on the constitutionality of the zoning classification meets this test. It put the council on notice that plaintiffs *156 were challenging the constitutionality of the existing zoning classification, and it focused the council’s attention upon the factors which might have rendered the classification unconstitutional. Unlike Bremby, plaintiffs used the word “constitutional,” and they proceeded to set forth factors which might affect the constitutionality of the R-100 classification. That is all that they were required to do. Id. at 511.
Relying upon
O S Advertising Co. v. Rubin,
Judgment reversed.
