91 Ga. App. 269 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1954
The court erred in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. Construing the petition and exhibits thereto against the plaintiffs, it necessarily alleges that the plaintiffs were architects and that they were acting as such in their dealings with the defendant. Paragraph 18 of the amended pe
The court erred in allowing the plaintiff’s following amendment at the 1953 December term of the court: “Plaintiffs show that the plans and drawings furnished defendants had a reasonable value of $3,600,” for the reason that at the November term, 1953, the court sustained a demurrer to paragraph 23 of the petition and ordered it stricken. McCandless v. Conley, 115 Ga. 48 (41 S. E. 256). No motion was made at the November term to alter, revoke, or modify the November term judgment sustaining the demurrer to paragraph 23 and striking it in its entirety.
The court erred in overruling the general demurrer to the petition and in overruling the objection to the amendment shown above. There is no no merit in the other exceptions to rulings on special demurrers. These errors rendered further proceedings nugatory.
Judgments reversed.