History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arvin L. Williams v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Lloyd W. Parker
91 F.3d 136
4th Cir.
1996
Check Treatment

91 F.3d 136

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Arvin L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Franklin E. FREEMAN, Jr.; Lloyd W. Parker, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 96-6241.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 23, 1996.
Decided July 31, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-49-5-CT-H)

Arvin L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Freeman, No. CA-96-49-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 1996). We also deny his motion for summary judgment and for an order of restraint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Arvin L. Williams v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Lloyd W. Parker
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 31, 1996
Citation: 91 F.3d 136
Docket Number: 96-6241
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.