History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service, Inc.
58 N.Y.2d 993
| NY | 1983
|
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

*995The Appellate Division properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The motion papers presented no question of fact for trial sufficient to negate the validity and binding effect of the disclaimer of warranty coverage. In addition, on the facts of this case, there being no privity between the purchaser and the defendant there can be no implied warranty.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service, Inc.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 22, 1983
Citation: 58 N.Y.2d 993
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.