History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arthur Britt v. State of Florida
15-2827
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Oct 18, 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ARTHUR BRITT, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-2827 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 7, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela Cox, Judge.

Diana L. Johnson of Johnson and Lufrano, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse and remand for resentencing on Counts I and II in accordance with Williams v. State, 186 So. 3d *2 989 (Fla. 2016), which held that consecutive mandatory minimum terms under the 10-20-Life statute are permissible but not mandatory where, as here, the defendant shot at multiple victims. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Arthur Britt v. State of Florida
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 18, 2016
Docket Number: 15-2827
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.