midpage

Arnold v. StateArnold v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 25, 1903
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Lamar
Lamar, J.

In a prosecution for gambling it is sufficient to show that the defendant, with others, played at cards for money, without proof of the character of the game, or which of the players lost or won.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Arnold v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 25, 1903
Citations: 117 Ga. 706; 45 S.E. 59; 1903 Ga. LEXIS 310
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In