Arnold v. Spring
143 N.Y.S. 1105
N.Y. App. Div.1913Check TreatmentJudgment reversed and new trial granted, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that the judgment appealed from is erroneous in the following particulars: First, plaintiff is not entitled to a lien for the value of the undelivered stove wood; second, plaintiff’s lien attaches to all the wood and logs remaining upon the plaintiff’s lands, and is hot limited to an undivided one-half thereof; third, plaintiff’s lien is limited in amount to the value of said wood and logs less the expense incurred by defendants in cutting and piling the same. All concurred.