Arnold v. Johnson
150 Ga. 604 | Ga. | 1920
1. “ It is only where discovery, is expressly prayed for in plaintiff’s petition that two witnesses, or one witness and corroborating circumstances, are required to rebut the answer of defendant, as to facts within his own knowledge, responsive to the discovery sought.” Toomer v. Warren, 123 Ga. 477 (51 S. E. 593) ; Civil Code (1910), § 4547.
2. There was no error in the court’s charge on the effect of certain conversations admitted in evidence, nor in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant.
3. The verdict was supported by evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.