Arner v. Andover Bank, 2008-A-0056 (11-3-2008)Arner v. Andover Bank, 2008-A-0056 (11-3-2008)
{¶ 2} Pursuant to
{¶ 3} In the case at bar, the trial court specified that the action was dismissed without prejudice. Thus, since Samuel could refile his claims within one year of his dismissal, the trial court's dismissal without prejudice is not a final appealable order. Hence, this court lacks jurisdiction at this time to consider this appeal.
{¶ 4} In addition, even if there was a final appealable order, Samuel's appeal was untimely filed pursuant to
{¶ 5} For the foregoing reasons, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte.
{¶ 6} Appeal dismissed.
*1DIANE V. GRENDELL, P.J., CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J., concur.