History
  • No items yet
midpage
Armstrong v. Snowden
107 So. 2d 619
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1958
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See §§ 742.011, 742.031 and 742.10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Ex parte Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64; Gossett v. Ullendorff, 114 Fla. 159, 154 So. 177; Eldridge v. Eldridge, 153 Fla. 873, 16 So.2d 163; Kowalski v. Wojtkowski, 19 N.J. 247, 116 A.2d 6, 53 A.L.R.2d 556.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., HORTON, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Armstrong v. Snowden
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 30, 1958
Citation: 107 So. 2d 619
Docket Number: No. 58-417
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.