History
  • No items yet
midpage
Armstrong v. . Borden's Condensed Milk Company
66 N.E. 1116
NY
1903
Check Treatment
O’Brien, J.

This case involves the same question as the case of Kane Company v. Kinney, which we have just decided. (174 N. Y. 69.) The two cases were argued *511 together and are governed by the same legal principles. On the authority of that case the judgment of the Appellate Division must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Paekeb, Oh. J., Babtlett, Mabtin, Yann, Cullen and Webneb, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Armstrong v. . Borden's Condensed Milk Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 6, 1903
Citation: 66 N.E. 1116
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.