History
  • No items yet
midpage
Armstrong Pharmacy v. Rector, Sheriff
146 S.E. 692
S.C.
1929
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

February 8, 1929. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This case is controlled by the case of Xepapas et al., Petitioners,v. Richardson, Chief Constable, et al., Respondents.146 S.E., 686, the opinion in which is filed herewith.

It is the judgment of this Court that the petitioners are entitled to an order of injunction restraining and enjoining the defendants from attempting to enforce the provisions of Sections 714 and 717 of the Criminal Code, as prayed for in their petition, and such order will issue.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS and MR. JUSTICE STABLER concur.

MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN and CARTER concur in result.






Concurrence Opinion

I am bound by the opinion of this Court in the recent case ofXepapas et al. v. Richardson, in which I did not concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Armstrong Pharmacy v. Rector, Sheriff
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Feb 8, 1929
Citation: 146 S.E. 692
Docket Number: 12582
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.